When loyalty programmes backfire: loyalty, entitlement and complaints

Disappointed customers complain. And while really loyal customers may be more forgiving that others, when they do feel disappointed and complain, they are particularly difficult to recover. These general truths of business make it particularly important to understand disappointment in loyal customers.

 

Researchers Xiaofei Li, Baolong Ma and Chen Zhou conducted a study about the link between customer loyalty and customer complaints in the airline industry. While this study has some methodological limitations (e.g., it relies on a sample of MBA students), it nonetheless offers some interesting and surprising (to me) findings about the role of type of loyalty reward in this relationship.

 

In terms of the link from customer loyalty to customer complaints, they concluded that the more a customer recommended the airline to others and the stronger the preference towards the airline, then the higher the expectations that that customer had in terms of service and effort from the airline. I.e., customer commitment is associated with a sense of entitlement.
Furthermore, the higher their sense of entitlement, the higher the likelihood that customers will complain when service fell below their expectations.

 

More interesting than the above finding, in my view, is the researchers’ exploration of the role that different types of loyalty reward on the sense of entitlement and, consequently, complaints. The authors write:

“Practitioners and researchers divide the benefits of loyalty programs into hard benefits and soft benefits. Hard benefits are generally tangible rewards, such as earning miles/points, discounts, and gifts, whereas soft benefits include special privileges, such as restricted check-in counters, special communications, and priority on wait lists”. (p.863)

 

The authors found that soft rewards amplified the link between customer commitment and sense of entitlement, whereas hard rewards reduced it.

aa conc fram
Image source

In other words, using programmes that stratify customers (e.g., platinum vs gold level), and which use status-based rewards such as access to a VIP lounge, exclusive phone line or dedicated check-in line can backfire. That’s because customers who see themselves to be in the highest levels of the company’s customer hierarchy, go on to feel entitled to services that match their perceived high standing.

 

Conversely, offering tangible rewards such as miles, free upgrades or gifts tended to lower the sense of entitlement. The authors argue that this is because such rewards have some economic value which are seen as being a reward for previous spending by the customer (as opposed to being tied to identity).

 

Some food for thought here, in terms of the pitfalls of customer loyalty, and the challenges of designing an effective customer loyalty programme.

4 thoughts on “When loyalty programmes backfire: loyalty, entitlement and complaints

  1. The point about recommending something then reinforcing one’s perception of the brand is an interesting one, and explains why companies can be so obsessed with this aspect of the brand experience.
    I was involved in a theoretical study of voter behaviour in elections which found that the more supporters were encouraged to recruit new supporters their belief in the party or candidate increased. We called this evangelisation. Clearly in a democracy there are generally no tangible rewards offered.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s